The now infamous Ashley
Madison website has had a successful run at helping its clientele be disloyal.
So perhaps some would view it as poetic justice if the website became one of
the most scandalous breaches in history at the hands of one of its own
After
thorough "IT security analyst John McAfee, who noted recently, "yes,
it is true." The website was not hacked by an outsider but rather by an
insider. The article stated that there
is a strong indication that the website data were stolen. There has always been
strong believe by organizations that most threats to security are external,
though empirical evidence has always supported the fact that most attacks to
security are from sources outside the firm's immediate environment. In most
cases, external attacks are motivated by the desire to profit from either by
selling the information in the black market or by blackmailing the firm.
The
article focuses on new trends of threats either by disgruntled, unsatisfied or
disengaged employees in stealing sensitive data from their employers.
Furthermore, the article also gave another instant "where four former
Gillette Company employees", where accused of disclosing confidential
information and trade secrets to direct competitor. The trend shows that more
and more firms are subjective to an insider attack.
In
many cases, when we talk insider threat, the person may no longer be with the
company – so if you add that piece to the definition you can see why it becomes
pretty big; much bigger than people probably think about
More
attention is being paid to activities within the organization; from negligence
employees to suspicious activities y employees. In retrospect, to mitigate
against security breach from employees, the articles noted that changes in
employee behavior could be a good pointer in spotting a potential rogue
employee.
References
Weldon, D., (2015). Are
your biggest security threats on the inside? Retrieved from:
No comments:
Post a Comment